Grammaticality
1. Both are correct. You can use either. May and might are used to talk about possible actions or happenings. They mean the same. It doesn't matter whether we use 'may' or 'might'. He may be going to London.= He might be going to London. She may be able to give you some money.= She might be able to give you some money.As this NGram shows, plural email correspondences is so rare compared to the singular form that it's not unreasonable to say it's not used in ordinary English. For the usage being examined, correspondence is a mass noun, which is why it's not normally pluralised. – FumbleFingers. Aug 26, 2014 at 15:28. Add a comment.
Did you know?
3 Answers. Yes, there's nothing wrong with it. Has here means something like owns or possesses and its direct object is the everything just before it. You can end a sentence with a verb that takes an object before it, even in formal writing, and it often (as in this case) sounds very natural.26 nov 2014 ... Great Ideas in Linguistics: Grammaticality Judgements · I ate the carrot yesterday. This sounds pretty good to me. I'd say it's “grammatical”. · * ...GRAMMATICALITY 5 possible and impossible in English, is too horrifying to be entertained for long. In most of the passages in which Chomsky discusses grammaticality, it is also true that he is ultimately concerned not with sentences in isolation, but with series of sentences to which given transforms may or may not be applied.May 9, 2016 · Perhaps next time, tag for both grammaticality and grammar, lest your nonconformity to tagging etiquette irk the ire of those who would accuse you of opportunistic pendanticality. "A speaker's linguistic competence, which is the knowledge that they have of their language, allows them to easily judge whether a sentence is grammatical or ...
All three are acceptable and in use. The form that is selected might vary, depending on what X, Y, and Z are, how the sentence is punctuated, what verb is in the sentence, and what preposition is used (other prepositions could be used, besides for, such as to, by, or on). "In the case of fixed capital, 1973-78 growth rates are close to 1973-76 rates both for total capital input and capital ...Grammaticality is a measure of how difficult it is to find a context in which the sentence makes sense. IF you pronounce "As suggested" properly, indicating that it's a …Well-formedness. In linguistics, well-formedness is the quality of a clause, word, or other linguistic element that conforms to the grammar of the language of which it is a part. Well-formed words or phrases are grammatical, meaning they obey all relevant rules of grammar. In contrast, a form that violates some grammar rule is ill-formed and ...4. As a rule of thumb, use "would" when you are talking about hypothetical situations, and "will" when you are referring to definite possibilities. In your examples, you are mixing the two. Number 1 is the best choice, because the hypothetical is at the beginning of the sentence (i.e., "What will" or "What would"), not the highlighted portion ...grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow asked Dec 14, 2018 at 14:19. Matthew Wells Matthew Wells. 21 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 2 2 bronze badges. 0. Add a comment | 3 Answers Sorted by: Reset to default 4 Yes, it is correct to say that because your subject and the be-verb are in agreement. ...
"I don't like it either" is the most common way a native English speaker would express this sentiment. "I don't like it too" and "I don't like it also" are generally seen as improper because, arranged this way, there's a contradiction between the negative "don't" and the inclusive "too"/"also"; the statement seems to reject and affirm at the same time. Contrary to that, "I also don't like it ...Jan 17, 2013 at 14:14. 1. But @BillFranke the OP is asking whether the second line can be used at all ("The people (of which there are many, many)"). My answer is no, it can't, but I couldn't tell you why. Good question. - JAM. Jan 17, 2013 at 14:51. 1. @JAM: Sure the second line can be used in colloquial English.Commas have a particular grammatical purpose: a pair of commas separates parenthetical content from the main sentence. Normally there might be a slight pause at the commas when reading the sentence, but a slight pause when reading is not a reason to introduce a comma when the grammar does not require it.. The book title, Book, is not parenthetical content in your sentence; in my sentence here ...…
Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Forgive me for not being able to be there at your birthday party. I a. Possible cause: The construct validity of grammaticality judgment te...
Acceptability and grammaticality. The goal of acceptability rating studies is to gather insights into the mental grammars of participants. As the grammaticality of a linguistic construction is an abstract construct that cannot be accessed directly, this type of tasks is usually not called grammaticality, but acceptability judgment. This can be ...Grammaticality: Speaker intuitions about whether a chunk of language is ‘correct’, ‘well-formed’, ‘valid’, or ‘understandable’ in their language Prescriptively Ungrammatical : A judgment that a chunk of language is ‘wrong’ or ‘incorrect’ on the basis of social, societal, contextual, or academic ‘rules’.
1 Answer. Both versions are perfectly fine. I will send you an email. "you" is an indirect object. It is understood that the subject is not sending "you", but rather sending the email. I will send an email to you. sounds a little stilted. In conversational English, you would probably use email as a verb. I will email you.Require with an agent subject can take an infinitive complement with B-Raising. That means no for, since that's the mark of an unRaised subject: A has required B to effect a change is grammatical. It can also take an untensed that-complement (what used to be called "the subjunctive"), but in this case the that complementizer cannot be deleted: A has …Grammatically, "I panicked" simply uses the intransitive verb "to panic" in the past-tense form. "I was panicked" is more complicated to analyze. As Edwin Ashworth's answer indicates, in principle, it could be seen as either a standard "eventive/dynamic" passive construction, or as a "stative/static" construction where "panicked" can be ...
taylor hurd 1. It depends. Quotes from Times's stylebook (explained here ): Often "or not" is redundant after whether, but not always. The phrase may ordinarily be omitted in these cases: • When the whether clause is the object of a verb: She wonders whether the teacher will attend. (The clause is the object of wonders.) believe it or not jail memephil dougherty Lenneberg (1967) hypothesized that language could be acquired only within a critical period, extending from early infancy until puberty. In its basic form, the critical period hypothesis need only have consequences for first language acquisition. Nevertheless, it is essential to our understanding of the nature of the hypothesized critical period to determine whether or not it extends as well ... five facts about langston hughes TheFreeDictionary.com gives this usage note:. Usage Note: The suffix -wise has a long history of use to mean "in the manner or direction of," as in clockwise, otherwise, and slantwise.Since the 1930s, however, the suffix has been widely used in the vaguer sense of "with respect to," as in This has not been a good year saleswise.Taxwise, it is an unattractive arrangement. craigslist madison wisconsin for saleuniversity of kansas fall break 2023se uso "Indeed" can start a sentence as either a conjunction or an interjection. As a conjunction, indeed provides emphasis or indicates that the sentence is an example of, or evidence for, a claim made in the previous sentence. As an interjection, indeed indicates surprise or sarcastic doubt. In this use, indeed is often the only word in the sentence.He thinks she'll marry him? procurement field Yes, it's correct. It's like this: He had had a lot of faith, but it had had no effect.There's a clause break after the second had showing where faith is sposta occur, but it's been moved to the front, changed to which or that, and subsequently deleted in the relative clause all the faith (which) he had had.The next had had is just the main verb … compare earthquake magnitudesjocosenessdavid l moss desk blotter 5. The word "baddest" does not describe the least desirable outcome. When talking about the least desirable outcome, the word you want to use is "worst". Many wouldn't accept "baddest" as a proper word at all. "Baddest" is common slang though, especially when used in conjunction with "biggest".