Wikipedia reliable source

24 jul 2020 ... The Wikipedia community recently engaged in a spir

Also, they prefer secondary sources to primary sources. Guidelines permit primary sources but official Wikipedia policy instructs, “Do not analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so.” In other words, experts must not act like experts.Wikipedia ISN'T a reliable source. Thats why you'll never see Wikipedia source itself. Wikipedia is ONLY a reliable source when it is BACKED UP by reliable sources. IMDB doesn't update 'only' from reliable updaters. Again, IMDB has posted numerous false information in the past. I don't hate Lommel. I've never seen any of his films.

Did you know?

In today’s fast-paced digital world, staying updated with the latest news is essential. With so much information available at our fingertips, it can be overwhelming to find reliable sources and keep track of all the news that matters to you...So, to summarize, it is true that Wikipedia is not a reliable source in academic circles. However, this does not have to mean that you can’t use it if you’re smart about it. Now that the reliability debate on Wikipedia is settled, once and for all, we can move on to the next part – how to effectively use Wikipedia for academic research …The Gateway Pundit was founded prior to the 2004 United States presidential election, [41] according to its founder, Jim Hoft, to "speak the truth" and to "expose the wickedness of the left". [42] The website's name makes reference to the Gateway Arch in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, where Hoft resides as of February 2018. [43]Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileIf you want generate a consensus for using Introvigne as a reliable source, that's a discussion for the Reliable Source Noticeboard. Even if you convinced me and Tom here on this talk page, we're only two voices and we don't have the power to go against the long-established consensus of many editors (which far predates my ever having heard the …The reliability of a source can help you judge the weight to give the opinions of that source. The more reliable the source, the more weight you should give its opinion. For sources of very low reliability, due weight may be no mention at all. Sources may still have systemic bias problems. Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.BitChute is an alt-tech video hosting service launched by Ray Vahey in January 2017. It describes itself as offering freedom of speech, while the service is known for hosting far-right individuals, conspiracy theorists, and hate speech. Some creators who use BitChute have been banned from YouTube; some others crosspost content to both platforms or post …Feb 8, 2017 · The site’s rules on reliable sources state: “Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published, sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared ... With that said, this is our 2020 list of go to fact checkers. Politifact– is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others who speak up in American politics. PolitiFact is owned by the Poynter Institute, which also operates the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN) that sets standards for fact ...JSTOR. JSTOR is an online library of all kinds of sources, such as books, articles, and journals. Even though access is limited, it can be a great help for students. It is also considered one of the most …29 oct 2022 ... Despite statistical evidence that Wikipedia's content is viewed frequently by users searching for health information, no concrete review or ...WP:BLP requires that any potentially defamatory information about a living person be sourced to a Wikipedia:reliable source (or to the person himself, in a published statement); court filings, or statements made under penalty of perjury, are not adequate. — Arthur Rubin 16:23, 1 September 2008 (UTC) ReplyJasper Jackson. Wikipedia editors have voted to ban the Daily Mail as a source for the website in all but exceptional circumstances after deeming the news group “generally unreliable”. The ...An anonymous reader writes "The BBC has up an article chatting with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. Wales views the Wikipedia site as an educational resource, and apparently thinks teachers who downplay the site are 'bad educators'. '[A] perceived lack of authority ... has drawn criticism from other ...In today’s digital age, having access to reliable and up-to-date software downloads is essential. Whether you are a business owner or an individual, finding the right source for Startek FM220 downloads is crucial.If you want generate a consensus for using Introvigne as a reliable source, that's a discussion for the Reliable Source Noticeboard. Even if you convinced me and Tom here on this talk page, we're only two voices and we don't have the power to go against the long-established consensus of many editors (which far predates my ever having heard the …I agree with Zero, the source is reliable and due because it is a review of a book in question. It makes common sense to summarize the author's views in an article on that book. - GizzyCatBella 🍁 14:20, 1 March 2023 (UTC) Reply ; I agree with Biruitorul, the source is reliable.Wiki-Transpose rely only on Wikipedia as information source for translations. The main goal of this paper is to check the coverage ratio of Wikipedia against specializedqueries that are related to medical domain. Wiki-Transpose was evaluated using bothEnglish and Portuguese medical queries.TheCollector is a community for scholars, classrooms, and enthusiasts. We broaden our audience's understanding of the humanities through articles and discoveries from ancient history to the modern era. Our interests include ancient through modern philosophy, renaissance paintings to modern sculptures, conquerors, conceptual art, and more. We ...

Print sources (and web-based versions of those sources) tend to be the most reliable. Examples include: books published by major publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, peer-reviewed scholarly journals, websites of any of the above, and other websites that meet the same requirements as a reputable print-based source. With that said, this is our 2020 list of go to fact checkers. Politifact– is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others who speak up in American politics. PolitiFact is owned by the Poynter Institute, which also operates the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN) that sets standards for fact ...As one of the most trusted news sources in the world, CNN has been bringing the latest news and updates to its viewers for decades. From breaking news stories to in-depth analysis, CNN has been a go-to source for reliable information.Citing the Internet Movie Database ( IMDb) on Wikipedia raises questions if such references do not follow the important points given in the reliable sources guideline. This is because much of the database content in IMDb is contributed by users, not by experts. Plus, the editorial oversight by IMDb staff is minimal and not stated on the site ...The claim “I consulted the most reliable source known to modern politicians – Wikipedia.” Steve Webb MP, pensions minister, House of Commons, 2008

In theory, Wikipedia is closer to being reliable than it is anything else. Of course, you are always bound to come upon an entry that is un-sourced and is clearly spouting lies, but the benefit of Wikipedia is that that kind of information can be deleted with relative quickness. With any print publications, errors are only made known when the ...At least three independent editors have reviewed the sources listed above and found them to not be reliable.Additionally, many editors have reviewed the sources in the article, especially the Casper Star Tribune article and found them to be reliable.Wikipedia is a private website, you have no right to free speech.If you legitimately believe that you are …Recognizing this challenge, researchers have developed an AI program called SIDE (Source-Inference from Derivability Evaluation) that aims to improve the reliability of Wikipedia references. SIDE achieves this by training algorithms to identify citations on the website that may be questionable. The AI program operates under the assumption that ...…

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. The information at Wikipedia:Reliable source exampl. Possible cause: This is a list of websites that editors frequently discuss on Wikipedia. Some of t.

When it comes to purchasing pre-owned cars, finding a trusted dealership is of utmost importance. Luther Ford Fargo has been serving the Fargo community for years, earning a reputation as a reliable source for quality pre-owned vehicles.In February 2017, pursuant to a formal community discussion, editors on the English Wikipedia banned the use of the Daily Mail as a source in most cases. Its use as a reference is now "generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist", and it can no longer be used as proof of notability.Wikipedia is an encyclopedia—that is, a comprehensive compendium of knowledge. The threshold for inclusion on Wikipedia is whether material is attributable to a reliable published source, not whether it is true. Wikipedia is not the place to publish your opinions, experiences, or arguments. Although everything on Wikipedia must be ...

Knewz also publishes its own news articles in mostly a summary format, citing other sources. We found that many of these stories favor the right such as this AOC slammed for selling $58 ‘Tax the Rich’ sweatshirts… which is why we’re giving them away for free (sort of).The primary source used for this story is the right biased and factually …Dec. 16, 2005 6:29 a.m. PT. 3 min read. Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us, according to a ...

In today’s fast-paced digital world, it can be challengin Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Help; Learn to edit; Community portal; Recent changes; Upload fileWW wiki is not a reliable source - Wikipedia Wikipedia is not a reliable source for citations elsewhere on Wikipedia. Because it can be edited by anyone at any ... As of September 2015, there is no article about Jimmy Capps on WikFor general information about data, publications and For popular articles, Wikipedia's online community of volunteers, administrators and bots ensure edits are based on reliable citations. Popular articles are reviewed thousands of times.The guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources gives general advice on what is and isn't a reliable source; this essay aims to analyse specific examples of sources that might initially appear to be reliable, yet may not be. If in doubt about a source, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard. This page in a nutshell: Cite reliable sources.You can ad Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources, and to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources. Secondary or tertiary sources are needed to establish the topic's notability and avoid novel interpretations of primary sources. Also see: Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Daily Mail. -- Guy Macon ( talk ) 22:52, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Consensus has determined that the Daily Mail (including its online version, dailymail.co.uk) is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is to be generally prohibited, especially when other more reliable sources exist. The online encyclopedia does not guarantee the validity of its inBitChute is an alt-tech video hosting service launched by Ray VaheyWhen it comes to purchasing pre-owned cars, finding a trus 9 jun 2022 ... Thus, for the time being, we do not recommend Wikipedia as a reliable source of information about MDPI. For a comprehensive history of MDPI ... Launched in 2020, Real Raw News is an anonymously run sat Wikipedia's policies patently obviously allow the encyclopaedia to contain information that is objectively false provided it is "verifiable" from a "reliable source", this is the trade-off to make collaboration feasible and against requiring it to work like an old-fashioned encyclopaedia with a single authoritative and genuinely well-informed editorial voice, but … 29 oct 2022 ... Despite statistical evidence that [Recognizing this challenge, researchers have developed an AI pThis is a project to work towards guidelines for History-related Here is the source (without the video): Williams, Nathan (2002-11-26) Homeopathy: The Test, Horizon (BBC) Retrieved on 2007-01-26 ; youtube is probably not the best reference, but the BBC is per Wikipedia:Reliable source examples#Science article in the popular press. Table Manners C·U·T 08:24, 26 January 2008 (UTC) Hi there TableManners.